| What I think warriors should get. | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
lolsoda Game Master
Posts : 76 Join date : 2013-03-16 Location : Sweden
| Subject: What I think warriors should get. Sat Mar 16, 2013 1:45 pm | |
| Okay, so I've been thinking of some spells and passive spells Warriors should get:
Prot: Passives: Critical Shield, Warbringer Abilitys: Shield Wall, Shockwave and Intervene
Arms: Passives: Deep Wounds, Second Wind and Taste for blood. Abilitys: Execute and Endless Rage.
Fury: Passives: Blood Craze, Dual Wield, Flurry, Titan's Grip Abilitys: Whirlwind, Berserker Stance, Pummel and Flurry.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I think this would be great, all you need to do Is to scale down the damage, then It will be great!! | |
|
| |
philipnks First Players
Posts : 349 Join date : 2013-03-01 Age : 26 Location : Sweden-Skane
| Subject: Re: What I think warriors should get. Sat Mar 16, 2013 1:46 pm | |
| Dude, thats too much, you don't need any talent to use em. | |
|
| |
lolsoda Game Master
Posts : 76 Join date : 2013-03-16 Location : Sweden
| Subject: Re: What I think warriors should get. Sat Mar 16, 2013 1:48 pm | |
| Fury warriors are so bad atm, and prot need Shockwave to keep agro. And arms/fury need the [Juggernaut] spec, and make It so you can use It In Defensive Stance. Warriors In PvP Is so bad. | |
|
| |
lolsoda Game Master
Posts : 76 Join date : 2013-03-16 Location : Sweden
| Subject: Re: What I think warriors should get. Sat Mar 16, 2013 1:55 pm | |
| I know what the rest of the classes should get aswell | |
|
| |
lolsoda Game Master
Posts : 76 Join date : 2013-03-16 Location : Sweden
| Subject: Re: What I think warriors should get. Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:20 pm | |
| Seriously, just give us warriors Juggernaut and give fury warriors whirlwind, berserker stance and flurry. You guys have nooo clue how bad warriors are. | |
|
| |
philipnks First Players
Posts : 349 Join date : 2013-03-01 Age : 26 Location : Sweden-Skane
| Subject: Re: What I think warriors should get. Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:24 pm | |
| I agree that Warrior needs more spells becouse they sucks. | |
|
| |
vxean Senior Member
Posts : 255 Join date : 2013-03-09 Age : 26 Location : Sweden :P
| Subject: Re: What I think warriors should get. Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:03 pm | |
| no, em charge in combat and battle shout shouldnt cost anything. that is waht warriors need | |
|
| |
lolsoda Game Master
Posts : 76 Join date : 2013-03-16 Location : Sweden
| Subject: Re: What I think warriors should get. Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:23 pm | |
| What I want, as a fury warrior Is Berserker stance, Intercept, charge available In berserker stance, Juggernaut and whirlwind, If you really think about It. I can be kited so badly by spell casters. | |
|
| |
philipnks First Players
Posts : 349 Join date : 2013-03-01 Age : 26 Location : Sweden-Skane
| Subject: Re: What I think warriors should get. Sat Mar 16, 2013 7:09 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
TheDora Moderator
Posts : 30 Join date : 2013-03-15
| Subject: Re: What I think warriors should get. Mon Mar 18, 2013 1:21 pm | |
| If anything, intercept could be added. The reason 2 handed melee classes are not peaked right now is because of the weapons improperly scaled. (1 handers have more overall stats then 2 handers) Once that is fixed, then I think stuff will start seeming much more balanced. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: What I think warriors should get. | |
| |
|
| |
| What I think warriors should get. | |
|